NEWS

\n Mark Sampson will receive a pay-off of around £80,000 from the FA after he was dismissed from his...
\nChelsea and prolific forward Alvaro Morata have thanked supporters for changing the words to a cont...
\nNeymar\'s record move to Paris Saint-Germain shock the world of football and there are more revelati...
\nBrighton match-winner Tomer Hemed is facing a three-match FA ban after stamping on Newcastle’s De...
\n Edwin van der Sar has warned the rest of the Premier League that Manchester United and Manchester ...
Read More
Stoke-City-v-Arsenal-Premier-League.jpg

…as Wenger berates officials over “very easy decision” after Lacazette goal disallowed

Date Posted,August 19, 2017

Arsene Wenger insisted Alexandre Lacazette’s disallowed goal should have stood at Stoke.

The Frenchman thought he had cancelled out Jese’s debut strike with a thunderous effort in the second half, but the linesman raised his flag.

Replays appeared to show the France international was fractionally offside, suggesting referee Andre Marriner was right to rule out the effort.

“I think we scored a goal that is not offside. It’s a very easy decision. When the ball is kicked he is not offside, Lacazette,” he said.

Both Martin Keown and Steven Gerrard argued with Graham Poll in the BT Sport studio that the match official got this decision very wrong at the bet 365 stadium.

The France international thought he had scored for Arsenal (Image: Getty Images Europe)
Stoke City Vs Arsenal
Replays were inconclusive (Image: BT Sport)
Wenger looks on (Image: Action Images via Reuters)

“How can the linesman say he is offside there?” asked Keown. “It’s got to be the torso, surely it’s the body.

“What happens to the advantage being given to the centre-forward? That goal from Lacazette was a great finish, and that goal should have counted for me today.”

Gerrard agreed, adding: “It’s onside because if there is no advantage to the front man then what is this rule that is out there?

The Frenchman’s strike was the closest Arsenal came to levelling (Image: AFP)

“The advantage should go to the front man here because for me there is only really his foot that’s offside.

Former Premier League referee Poll was then asked for his opinion, and explained: “Any part of the body that can play with the football legally – and a foot is one of those things – if that is nearer the goal than the defender then it is offside.

“As much as we want to see good goals, that was offside, I’m not sure quite how the assistant referee has seen it, it’s a different coloured football boot.

Jese scored for the Potters on his debut at the bet 365 stadium (Image: Rex Features)

“Maybe that’s helped him, but we can’t say it’s wrong when it’s not, it’s definitely offside, it’s the right decision, how he gets it right, your guess is as good as mine.”

Gerrard then asked Poll whether he thinks the linesman may have guessed, to which the former official agreed he may well have.

Martin Keown believes the referee made a mistake in ruling out the goal (Image: @BBCMOTD/Twitter)

Keown then spoke out once again, suggesting the referee has in fact “gambled he is right” before stating the rule that gives advantage to the centre-forward is pointless.

The conversation finished with presenter Jake Humphrey talking over the trio to move the subject on, as it seemed none of the three were willing to concede defeat in the debate.

poll loading

Did the referee make the right call here?

3000+ VOTES SO FAR

Back to previous page

payment with

Security